collapse

Have you considered registering for an account on the forum? Many benefits await!


Author Topic: Not a Micro Four Thirds Camera  (Read 664 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline peterb666

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1130
    • View Profile
    • PeterB Photography Blog
Not a Micro Four Thirds Camera
« on: July 29, 2010, 12:09:22 AM »
The first digital camera was made by Kodak some 35 years ago in 1975.

A CCD image sensor recorded a 100 line black and white image onto cassette tape in a speedy 23 seconds.

It was portable but not exactly pocketable and relied on 16 NiCAD batteries to power it.

It used a VCR-sized microcomputer to display images on a TV screen.

Kodak saw it as a threat to their product lines and refused to acknowledge such a creature existed until 2001.

This article was written a couple of years ago and although brief is fascinating...

Kodak Digital Camera

The Micro Four Thirds cameras that we use owe their heritage to this previously forgotten camera.

If you find something interesting in the way of early cameras, film or digital, you might like to share them in this thread.

Comments on any cameras posted welcome.

Over to you to see who can post the most interesting camera...
« Last Edit: July 29, 2010, 12:11:49 AM by peterb666 »
Be nice to each other, life is too short for anything else.

Online voyager

  • Webmaster
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 11943
    • View Profile
Re: Not a Micro Four Thirds Camera
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2010, 12:37:08 AM »
Although not quite as revolutionary as the one that you posted, the one that has always inspired me is the start of the Canon EOS Digital Camera line.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Kodak/kodak_dcs520.asp



Olympus E-P1 | E-P1.net owner

Have any questions? Send me a Personal Message!

Online adash

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 6600
  • E-P1 & film fanatic & Olympus fanboy
    • View Profile
Re: Not a Micro Four Thirds Camera
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2010, 12:45:24 AM »
The tchnology has been in existance for quite a while, it seems. Profitability and technology do not always go hand by hand, you know. Evey industry seems to have it's forgotten children.
If you like the forum, or if you received a helpful tip here, why not donate a dollar or two to help us pay for its hosting?

Speak up now, because tomorrow there might be nobody left to hear you!

Panther

  • Guest
Re: Not a Micro Four Thirds Camera
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2010, 02:43:46 AM »
And for Nikon owners (and others who are just curious about Nikon)
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/nikon/htmls/models/index.htm

Online adash

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 6600
  • E-P1 & film fanatic & Olympus fanboy
    • View Profile
Re: Not a Micro Four Thirds Camera
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2010, 03:16:29 AM »
http://apphotnum.free.fr/N2BE2.html

1 The Nikon analog recording cameras

Quote
This camera, whose design lines precede them of Nikon N8008 which will come out two years later, is built around a sensor 2/3 " CCC of 300 000 pixels. Luminous signals catched by the CCD, are converted in tension whose value is continuous and, to the difference of actual digital cameras are not translated in bytes. These tensions are then recorded on a magnetic floppy disc of 2'' of diameter. This floppy disc allows recording 25 or 50 B&W images, depending of the definition. The same diskette will be used by the Canon Ion, first digital camera for the mass-market.
It is because there are no conversion tension-bytes that this camera will keep the designation "electronic" or "analogical" and not "digital".
The small size of the sensor brought to the adoption of a specific mounting, the F lenses, which can be gone up using an adapter.
Two lenses were foreseen 6mm/1,6 and 10~40mm/1,4.
If you like the forum, or if you received a helpful tip here, why not donate a dollar or two to help us pay for its hosting?

Speak up now, because tomorrow there might be nobody left to hear you!

Panther

  • Guest
Re: Not a Micro Four Thirds Camera
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2010, 08:50:40 PM »
Even more for Nikon & Kodak lovers...
http://www.nikonweb.com/

Online voyager

  • Webmaster
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 11943
    • View Profile
Re: Not a Micro Four Thirds Camera
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2010, 12:45:08 AM »
The Contax N Digital

The very first full frame camera ever created for digital cameras. Ever heard of it? Most of you haven't. That's because it was a complete failure of a camera.
Olympus E-P1 | E-P1.net owner

Have any questions? Send me a Personal Message!

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
29 Replies
2945 Views
Last post March 23, 2011, 01:44:36 PM
by Em5 Pete
36 Replies
3263 Views
Last post April 01, 2012, 02:58:28 AM
by sschoen1
4 Replies
1839 Views
Last post November 01, 2010, 08:42:04 AM
by Olof in Amsterdam
25 Replies
3751 Views
Last post September 09, 2011, 09:51:18 PM
by adash
12 Replies
2301 Views
Last post June 25, 2011, 12:43:08 AM
by adash


Recent Topics

Last post wins! by adash
[Today at 02:34:25 AM]


Canon unvail new Ti4/650ti, and Mirror-less ?? by panzerfaustnl
[Today at 02:07:55 AM]


Venice with the X100 by acidfood
[Today at 02:06:36 AM]


The Orient Fire House (again) by voyager
[Today at 02:03:07 AM]


Post anything... just post !!!! by voyager
[Today at 02:02:12 AM]


Portraits at a party by voyager
[Today at 02:01:48 AM]


Captivating Eyes by voyager
[Today at 02:01:16 AM]


Purple with a dash of yellow by voyager
[Today at 02:01:07 AM]


My first pictures with the e-pm1/ 14-42 ezm by voyager
[Today at 02:00:48 AM]


Name this tree's flower by voyager
[Today at 02:00:17 AM]


Extreme use of adapters by voyager
[Today at 01:57:48 AM]


Question about which Long zoom... by voyager
[Today at 01:56:42 AM]


Which E-M5 kit lens to go with? by voyager
[Today at 01:55:44 AM]


Will you be getting the Panasonic 12-35mm? by voyager
[Today at 01:55:14 AM]


Make your iPhone rival the Fuji X100! by panzerfaustnl
[Today at 01:54:53 AM]


* Recent Gallery



SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal