collapse

Have you considered registering for an account on the forum? Many benefits await!


Author Topic: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200  (Read 2518 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline exzrael

  • Obsessed
  • *
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
    • Teknikbrunnen.se
Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« on: September 04, 2010, 11:25:08 PM »
Just tested my Olympus PEN E-PL1 with noisefilter on and off at ISO100 and 200, just for fun. And I was amazed how much noise there is in the darker parts - have I missed something here or do you guys experience the same thing? That just can't be right. I know this isn't the best way of testing ISO-noise and stuff but still, I did it my way.

And one more thing - is there a gradation-setting in E-PL1? If so, I just can't find it.(found it!)

Here is a link for the images and here is a crop from all four 4:3 testimages.

Brus av = noisefilter off
Brus på = noisefilter on (standard)
« Last Edit: September 05, 2010, 06:57:11 PM by exzrael »
-- Do you hate my english? Well, so do I.
-- Owner of an Olympus Pen E-PL1 with a 14-42 mm kitlens.

Panther

  • Guest
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2010, 05:13:16 AM »
Hmmm...
Looks like there's more noise with the filter on...

Offline voyager

  • Webmaster
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 11915
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2010, 11:55:57 AM »
That is because the base ISO of the E-P1 starts at ISO 200. ISO is simply an ISO 200 photo that is digital downgraded, which is why there's so much highlight loss.
Olympus E-P1 | E-P1.net owner

Have any questions? Send me a Personal Message!

Offline mikmas101

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1171
    • View Profile
    • Flikr pages
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2010, 12:30:28 PM »
have I missed something here or do you guys experience the same thing?

Don't know if you are using the 14-42 kit lens for these but if so - yes, it can be damn noisy and at any ISO setting. One of the main reasons I dropped it in favour of MF lenses.

I took the kit lens with me for a family outing this week for the first time in months and I regretted it as soon as I had chance to view the images on my home PC. The majority were soft to very soft and with very noisy shadow areas. Even with strong sunlit subjects the results were disappointing to say the least.

My suspicion is that the in-lens corrective filters have much way too much input
Some of my snaps are on Flickr 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikmas101

If you enjoy your visits to E-P1.net why not donate a dollar or two to help Voyager foot the bill?

Panther

  • Guest
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2010, 09:43:07 PM »
Hmmm....
I've heard of sharp & soft lenses, fast & slow lenses, but noisy lenses?

Offline lisandra

  • Sharpness queen
  • E-P3
  • *
  • Posts: 5304
  • go out and shoot...NOW!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2010, 10:30:26 PM »
www.google.com, it's this radical new site!! try it out, it's free!
More megapixels don't necessarily mean more resolution...

Offline adash

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 6592
  • E-P1 & film fanatic & Olympus fanboy
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2010, 10:32:14 PM »
Try to keep a polite voice, please!
If you like the forum, or if you received a helpful tip here, why not donate a dollar or two to help us pay for its hosting?

Speak up now, because tomorrow there might be nobody left to hear you!

Ian Tindale

  • Guest
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2010, 10:41:54 PM »
Yes, what’s wrong with bing?

Offline lisandra

  • Sharpness queen
  • E-P3
  • *
  • Posts: 5304
  • go out and shoot...NOW!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2010, 10:54:02 PM »
Try to keep a polite voice, please!
sorry...um um.... must be medication time...
More megapixels don't necessarily mean more resolution...

Offline mink70

  • Pre-orderer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2010, 11:18:22 PM »
The main reason I've refrained from buying an E-PL1 is the way the camera handles noise. Compared to the E-P1/2, there appears to be more aggressive noise reduction applied to the jpegs in-camera, and as a result the noise looks more digital and processed, and to me, more objectionable. There's a lot of talk about the E-PL1 having the best jpeg engine among the PENs, but not to me. Anyone else have the same experience?

Offline lisandra

  • Sharpness queen
  • E-P3
  • *
  • Posts: 5304
  • go out and shoot...NOW!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2010, 09:50:45 AM »
Anyone else have the same experience?
nope. I'm gonna go ahead and predict you're alone in that camp
More megapixels don't necessarily mean more resolution...

Offline mikmas101

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1171
    • View Profile
    • Flikr pages
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2010, 11:29:58 AM »
 - take away all the nice algorithms and such that your onboard gizmos are applying to the image and you will find that the plastic barrel you have stuck on the front of your panny, oly or whatever is a pile of crap

barrel distortion, chromatic aberration et al...

Unfortunate side effect from all this correction is that each stage can introduce is own little evil demons - noise, artefacts, micro distortions, loss of detail....the list goes on.

So yes - the more compromised a lens is, the noisier it can be - and the Oly kit lens is NOISY....
« Last Edit: September 10, 2010, 09:49:50 AM by mikmas101 »
Some of my snaps are on Flickr 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikmas101

If you enjoy your visits to E-P1.net why not donate a dollar or two to help Voyager foot the bill?

Offline mink70

  • Pre-orderer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #12 on: September 07, 2010, 11:34:47 AM »
Anyone else have the same experience?
nope. I'm gonna go ahead and predict you're alone in that camp

Well, thanks for the sentiment, but perhaps the first message in this post suggests otherwise?

Offline mikmas101

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1171
    • View Profile
    • Flikr pages
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #13 on: September 07, 2010, 12:10:56 PM »

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/distortion/

<<Kazuto Yamaki, Chief Operating Officer for lens maker Sigma explains how this can work in more detail: 'compromise in distortion and chromatic aberration is a very effective in making lenses more compact and reducing cost. In general, compromising the distortion at the wide-angle end affects the compactness of the lens and compromising the CA influences cost reduction.' It's not without its drawbacks, he says: 'it's also true that doing this deteriorates the image quality if we correct them with image processing. It may not be very obvious if you look at the images in small format, but it becomes recognizable when enlarged. In the case of users who are very, very insistent on top image quality, they may not be 100% satisfied with such images.' As a result, no Sigma lenses currently require software correction.>>
Some of my snaps are on Flickr 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikmas101

If you enjoy your visits to E-P1.net why not donate a dollar or two to help Voyager foot the bill?

Offline voyager

  • Webmaster
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 11915
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2010, 12:50:20 PM »
This thread is making me uncomfortable. Please don't give me headaches. Thanks.
Olympus E-P1 | E-P1.net owner

Have any questions? Send me a Personal Message!

Panther

  • Guest
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2010, 03:59:23 PM »
I don't think CA is the same as noise....

Offline lisandra

  • Sharpness queen
  • E-P3
  • *
  • Posts: 5304
  • go out and shoot...NOW!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2010, 06:04:16 PM »
CA is not noise, and correcting for it doesn't bring it on either. Barrel distortion is not noise either, and correcting for it also doesn't create noise, a smudge detail or loss of it maybe, but no, noise won't come from it. So in the end regardless of how crappy a lens is noise can't be born from it. Besides, what doesn't make sense in all of this is that two lenses on the same camera give different noise levels, JPEG output is the same for all lenses given the same camera. 
More megapixels don't necessarily mean more resolution...

Offline lisandra

  • Sharpness queen
  • E-P3
  • *
  • Posts: 5304
  • go out and shoot...NOW!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2010, 06:07:26 PM »
And...I apologize if I insulted anyone on this thread, it's not my intention, really, so I'm sorry. I kind of have a short fuse when it comes to wrong information being shown as facts, that's all. Again, I'm sorry 
More megapixels don't necessarily mean more resolution...

Offline lisandra

  • Sharpness queen
  • E-P3
  • *
  • Posts: 5304
  • go out and shoot...NOW!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2010, 06:11:55 PM »
Anyone else have the same experience?
nope. I'm gonna go ahead and predict you're alone in that camp

Well, thanks for the sentiment, but perhaps the first message in this post suggests otherwise?
I say that because I think the EPL1 handles the noise way better than the other PENs, and all reviews seem to agree with that. In terms of detail and quality, I imagine noise reduction has to take its toll on something, so on that part well you're right
More megapixels don't necessarily mean more resolution...

Offline mink70

  • Pre-orderer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #19 on: September 07, 2010, 09:33:26 PM »

I say that because I think the EPL1 handles the noise way better than the other PENs, and all reviews seem to agree with that. In terms of detail and quality, I imagine noise reduction has to take its toll on something, so on that part well you're right

My point isn't that the EP-L1 has more or less noise—the sensor is the same—just that the engineers at Olympus decided to suppress it more aggressively. This makes the noise appear lower in some instances, especially at lower ISOs, but also makes the shadows look blotchier and murkier. To my eye, they E-PL1 photos also have a slightly more "plastic"  look, a la Canon.

The reason I like using my E-P1 so much is not its resolution or freedom from noise—in these respects it can't touch the Nikon 300D I sold to get it—but how esthetically pleasing its photos can look. The way it handles noise reminds me of  shooting Tri-X. (And of course I love the colors.) I was ready to get the lighter, cheaper E-PL1, but the images look more conventionally digital, and therefore disappointing, to me. They just don't have the analog look of the E-P1/2, which reminds of the E-1 I had for years. Cameras are rather personal, aren't they?

Offline mikmas101

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1171
    • View Profile
    • Flikr pages
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2010, 03:07:52 PM »
CA is not noise, and correcting for it doesn't bring it on either. Barrel distortion is not noise either, and correcting for it also doesn't create noise, a smudge detail or loss of it maybe, but no, noise won't come from it. 

And that is exactly where I am disagreeing with you.

Correction of the magnitude required to cope with the sometimes extreme barrel distortion noted by the dp review (and others) of the Oly kit lens is unlikely to come free. To correct this requires a very significant intrusion into the image data required to build the whole map, not just the edges. In certain cases this intrusion (even when coupled with noise reducing algorithms) can amplify existing image noise - shadows being particularly vulnerable to this.

But if I'm completely wrong, how else would you account for the acute lack of noise I get when using a wide range of manual lenses - which will not be corrected - on the same camera body with the same sensor and the rubbish that litters the shadows when using the 14-42? (and I have plenty of samples) Rubbish that is less or absent when using the Panny kit lens for instance.

You were completely correct at one point - lens elements do not produce noise - so what is?
« Last Edit: September 08, 2010, 03:34:36 PM by mikmas101 »
Some of my snaps are on Flickr 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikmas101

If you enjoy your visits to E-P1.net why not donate a dollar or two to help Voyager foot the bill?

Panther

  • Guest
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #21 on: September 08, 2010, 04:06:19 PM »
I love it when these degrade into a "who's right" contest..... 8)

Offline mikmas101

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1171
    • View Profile
    • Flikr pages
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2010, 04:41:10 PM »
Panther - without debate there is no knowledge.

I would rather constructively disagree than sullenly acquiesce......
Some of my snaps are on Flickr 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikmas101

If you enjoy your visits to E-P1.net why not donate a dollar or two to help Voyager foot the bill?

Panther

  • Guest
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2010, 04:50:26 PM »
I debate at work all the time without it degrading to a "who's right/wrong" situation..... 8)

Offline adash

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 6592
  • E-P1 & film fanatic & Olympus fanboy
    • View Profile
Re: Noisetest at ISO100 and 200
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2010, 10:13:14 PM »
Every lens has vigneting besides distortion. Coping with vigneting requires brightening peripherial areas, which may bring noise even at low ISO. This should not affect the center of the image however. That's what I can speculate from what I already know.
If you like the forum, or if you received a helpful tip here, why not donate a dollar or two to help us pay for its hosting?

Speak up now, because tomorrow there might be nobody left to hear you!

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
9 Replies
1400 Views
Last post April 24, 2011, 09:08:42 AM
by adash


Recent Topics

Portraits at a party by javarob75
[Today at 05:42:23 PM]


Pentax K-30 by cosinaphile
[Today at 05:37:57 PM]


Which E-M5 kit lens to go with? by cosinaphile
[Today at 05:30:40 PM]


Last post wins! by Jason C
[Today at 05:01:33 PM]


Name this tree's flower by tadeobiologo
[Today at 04:52:55 PM]


Local Birds around a Feeder by tadeobiologo
[Today at 04:50:05 PM]


Will you be getting the Panasonic 12-35mm? by Jman
[Today at 04:30:10 PM]


Captivating Eyes by Jman
[Today at 04:28:13 PM]


My first pictures with the e-pm1/ 14-42 ezm by Centauri27
[Today at 04:14:42 PM]


Canon unvail new Ti4/650ti, and Mirror-less ?? by cosinaphile
[Today at 04:01:44 PM]


The Orient Fire House (again) by Jman
[Today at 03:37:26 PM]


Waiting for the mail.....What are you waiting for? by Centauri27
[Today at 03:17:43 PM]


Nigeria by tamoio
[Today at 02:59:30 PM]


RE 35mm Digital Cartridge to make 35mm cameras a digital ..... Real or Fake? by Em5 Pete
[Today at 01:53:39 PM]


Question about which Long zoom... by Em5 Pete
[Today at 01:14:14 PM]


* Recent Gallery



SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal