Topic: Your favorite Four Thirds lens to use on your Micro Four Thirds Camera (Read 722 times)

voyager · « **on:** July 20, 2010, 05:56:58 PM »

Although I never had an adapter, I would definitely like to pick up an Olympus 17.5-45mm. That lens just intrigues me and I would love to get it.

voyager · « **Reply #1 on:** July 20, 2010, 05:57:18 PM »

Although I think the Olympus 40-150mm would be the best choice on it.

cosinaphile · « **Reply #2 on:** July 20, 2010, 06:04:10 PM »

for af ..........it would be the 17 oly 2.8

for manual focus its a toss up between the voigtlander 50 1.5AND BELIEVE IT OR NOT THE PENTAX 110 18MM 2.8

the tiny 18 is a sweet little lens that is nice and sharp with good depth of field, i also love my little 15 mm voigtlander, with astounding depth of field

voyager · « **Reply #3 on:** July 20, 2010, 06:05:27 PM »

None of those are standard Four Thirds mount lenses though...

cosinaphile · « **Reply #4 on:** July 20, 2010, 06:18:24 PM »

oops misread the title ,,as emily latella said

never mind

mikmas101 · « **Reply #5 on:** July 20, 2010, 06:21:50 PM »

Quote from: voyager on July 20, 2010, 05:57:18 PM

Although I think the Olympus 40-150mm would be the best choice on it.

I'll have one for sale on ebay tomorrow if you're interested - although shipping from UK to US might be a breaker...

voyager · « **Reply #6 on:** July 20, 2010, 06:26:58 PM »

Quote from: mikmas101 on July 20, 2010, 06:21:50 PM

Quote from: voyager on July 20, 2010, 05:57:18 PM
Although I think the Olympus 40-150mm would be the best choice on it.

I'll have one for sale on ebay tomorrow if you're interested - although shipping from UK to US might be a breaker...

I'm afraid at the moment I don't have a camera to mount it on! Thanks anyways.

Tercha · « **Reply #7 on:** July 20, 2010, 06:30:30 PM »

Quote from: voyager on July 20, 2010, 06:26:58 PM

Quote from: mikmas101 on July 20, 2010, 06:21:50 PM
Quote from: voyager on July 20, 2010, 05:57:18 PM
Although I think the Olympus 40-150mm would be the best choice on it.

I'll have one for sale on ebay tomorrow if you're interested - although shipping from UK to US might be a breaker...

I'm afraid at the moment I don't have a camera to mount it on! Thanks anyways.

Do the opposite of everyone else....buy lenses..... then get a camera body!

voyager · « **Reply #8 on:** July 20, 2010, 06:31:30 PM »

Quote from: Tercha on July 20, 2010, 06:30:30 PM

Quote from: voyager on July 20, 2010, 06:26:58 PM
Quote from: mikmas101 on July 20, 2010, 06:21:50 PM
Quote from: voyager on July 20, 2010, 05:57:18 PM
Although I think the Olympus 40-150mm would be the best choice on it.

I'll have one for sale on ebay tomorrow if you're interested - although shipping from UK to US might be a breaker...

I'm afraid at the moment I don't have a camera to mount it on! Thanks anyways.

Do the opposite of everyone else....buy lenses..... then get a camera body!

I see what you did there!

Either way, like mikmas101 said, the shipping would probably end up being more than the lens is!

voyager · « **Reply #9 on:** July 20, 2010, 06:32:05 PM »

But if anyone has an extra 17.5-45mm laying around, I'll be glad to take it.

mikmas101 · « **Reply #10 on:** July 20, 2010, 06:35:12 PM »

Love your quote Tercha...and the man who said it....and his photos.

<<There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. - Ansel Adams>>

adash · « **Reply #11 on:** July 21, 2010, 10:36:29 AM »

Quote

Either way, like mikmas101 said, the shipping would probably end up being more than the lens is!

I am used to this for quite a while.

I would love a fast focusing, CD AF-compatible Olympus ZD 14-54MM F/2.8-3.5 II. Or a Sigma 18-50MM F/2.8 EX DC MACRO on m4/3.

Olof in Amsterdam · « **Reply #12 on:** July 22, 2010, 03:42:56 PM »

Getting back to the topic, my favourite is the 50mm/2 macro. Focus hunts, but is still faster than manual and very accurate. Sharpness is excellent.

voyager · « **Reply #13 on:** July 22, 2010, 03:43:22 PM »

It isn't very large on Micro Four Thirds cameras either, is it?

Olof in Amsterdam · « **Reply #14 on:** July 23, 2010, 02:39:05 AM »

No, balance is ok. It's about 15mm longer and 10mm thicker than the Pany 14-45mm.

Verist · « **Reply #15 on:** July 23, 2010, 05:13:51 AM »

I really like the quality of the pictures taken with my Panasonic 20mm. It also force me to be creative when composing a shot since it is a prime. It also adds very little to the camera's small profile.

voyager · « **Reply #16 on:** July 23, 2010, 08:17:53 AM »

Quote from: Verist on July 23, 2010, 05:13:51 AM

I really like the quality of the pictures taken with my Panasonic 20mm. It also force me to be creative when composing a shot since it is a prime. It also adds very little to the camera's small profile.

I hear this almost too much, Panasonic definitely did something right with this lens, probably why they can get away with charging $450 for it.

Centauri27 · « **Reply #17 on:** July 30, 2010, 12:18:11 PM »

Quote from: voyager on July 23, 2010, 08:17:53 AM

I hear this almost too much, Panasonic definitely did something right with this lens, probably why they can get away with charging $450 for it.

Indeed. What helped sway me were the unreal reviews on Amazon: I don't recall anything else that received almost all 5 stars, with a couple of 4 stars...and nothing below that! No haters, gripers, or anyone with anything bad to say about the lens! On top of that were the blogs from pro and semi pro photographers all extolling the virtues of the lens (with one photog gushing how his E-P2/20mm blew away his $3500 Nikon D3/50mm f/1.8 for image quality).

YouDidntDidYou · « **Reply #18 on:** July 30, 2010, 02:00:33 PM »

that's easy the Leica f1.4 25mm even has aperture ring control as well as excellent sharpness and bokeh

Panther · « **Reply #19 on:** July 30, 2010, 04:52:17 PM »

Quote from: voyager on July 20, 2010, 05:57:18 PM

Although I think the Olympus 40-150mm would be the best choice on it.

Agreed 100% (especially if you're only going to have one lens).......Which is why I picked one up today...

voyager · « **Reply #20 on:** July 30, 2010, 06:18:41 PM »

I think you read that wrong, Panther. I was talking about the Olympus 4/3 40-150mm lens.

Panther · « **Reply #21 on:** July 30, 2010, 06:52:53 PM »

Quote from: voyager on July 30, 2010, 06:18:41 PM

I think you read that wrong, Panther. I was talking about the Olympus 4/3 40-150mm lens.

Correct!
I definitely read it wrong! $:-\$

Hygelacsthane · « **Reply #22 on:** August 22, 2010, 04:05:14 PM »

I'm trying to figure out my next lens for my e-p1. I'm looking at the Olympus 40-150mm - I think I need an adapter - would the adapter be the mmf-1? Is there an adapter for Nikon-to-ep1? Thanks for the info.

capodave · « **Reply #23 on:** August 22, 2010, 07:42:00 PM »

I'll Chime in......Panny 20mm.
Sharp and clear in almost all conditions, and makes me better at getting the picture.
I also have the 14-42 kit lens and 40-150 ED and have just started using an FD Canon 50mm 1.8 from my old film camera. I received the adapter this week, and it works great.
Dave

Centauri27 · « **Reply #24 on:** August 27, 2010, 01:32:31 PM »

Quote from: capodave on August 22, 2010, 07:42:00 PM

have just started using an FD Canon 50mm 1.8 from my old film camera. I received the adapter this week, and it works great.

I just received my FD-m4/3 adapter as well and it is wonderful! Lucky for me I kept my 50mm FD lens when I sold my A-1 years ago. It's so nice to have aperture control, as well as a distance scale and DOF markers. And the manual focus is so much nice. Now I can get rid of that clumsy 50mm EF lens.

News:

Author Topic: Your favorite Four Thirds lens to use on your Micro Four Thirds Camera (Read 722 times)

Social Bookmarks

Forum Theme

Recent Gallery

Ads