Author Topic: PLEASE DELETE ME (Read 771 times)

pretzston · « **on:** February 05, 2012, 05:45:47 PM »

PLEASE DELETE THIS THREAD, HAD AN ERROR

lisandra · « **Reply #1 on:** February 05, 2012, 06:39:22 PM »

cool thread!!I was thinking about buying a canon about a month ago, someone delete me!!!

E-M5 Pete · « **Reply #2 on:** February 05, 2012, 06:43:19 PM »

for real?

pretzston · « **Reply #3 on:** February 05, 2012, 06:44:50 PM »

It keeps saying I don't have permission to delete it!

lisandra · « **Reply #4 on:** February 05, 2012, 06:51:27 PM »

not really, I got a good offer on a bunch of canon l glass so the thought crossed my mind briefly

E-M5 Pete · « **Reply #5 on:** February 05, 2012, 06:59:13 PM »

I can,
Do you want me to delete this?

lisandra · « **Reply #6 on:** February 05, 2012, 07:05:23 PM »

prezton wants to, I was just joking around

E-M5 Pete · « **Reply #7 on:** February 05, 2012, 07:19:10 PM »

his thread, reply, and I will.

pretzston · « **Reply #8 on:** February 05, 2012, 07:35:33 PM »

Oh yeah? What glass? Lemme in on it!

This can be deleted after we are done with this new convo

lisandra · « **Reply #9 on:** February 05, 2012, 09:33:32 PM »

Basically everything you had on your list, the 85L, 24-70, 50 1.4, 35 1.4, 70-200 2.8II. Thing is I had to buy em all at once in a package. It was thousands of dollars less so if was a good deal but no ultimately cause, well...Do I really want another system?

voyager · « **Reply #10 on:** February 05, 2012, 09:35:29 PM »

It's forum policy not to delete any threads with replies.

You gotta deal with it now.

lisandra · « **Reply #11 on:** February 05, 2012, 10:34:10 PM »

ok so...lets turn this into a thing...post something you either did or thought about doing that was reeeeeally stupid and then say: someone please delete me!

cosinaphile · « **Reply #12 on:** February 06, 2012, 12:02:36 AM »

pretty good thread so far , im still readin

pretzston · « **Reply #13 on:** February 06, 2012, 06:07:13 AM »

I'm literally about the buy the 70-200 I think. Literally, I think. Ha.

I have:

35 1.4
50 1.4
45 T/S 2.8
17-40 4.0
Sigma 85 1.4

Have barely had to get out with it all yet either. But, engagements and weddings coming soon!

lisandra · « **Reply #14 on:** February 06, 2012, 08:31:56 AM »

Quote from: pretzston on February 06, 2012, 06:07:13 AM

I'm literally about the buy the 70-200 I think. Literally, I think. Ha.

I have:

35 1.4
50 1.4
45 T/S 2.8
17-40 4.0
Sigma 85 1.4

Have barely had to get out with it all yet either. But, engagements and weddings coming soon!

we might as well use this thread, do you mind posting me a sample with the sigma 85 at 1.4 and at 2.8 manually focused? A person if its at all possible from the chest up focused at the eye. I really want to see the rendering of that lens on full frame.

pretzston · « **Reply #15 on:** February 06, 2012, 09:09:38 AM »

I'd be happy to! Just gotta find a minute. Maybe Friday? Remind me!

lisandra · « **Reply #16 on:** February 06, 2012, 09:42:23 AM »

will do

voyager · « **Reply #17 on:** February 06, 2012, 10:58:16 PM »

So, what is this thread about now?

pretzston · « **Reply #18 on:** February 07, 2012, 05:28:38 PM »

Canons. Ha.

Jason C · « **Reply #19 on:** February 07, 2012, 05:53:41 PM »

Quote from: pretzston on February 06, 2012, 06:07:13 AM

I'm literally about the buy the 70-200 I think. Literally, I think. Ha.

I have:

35 1.4
50 1.4
45 T/S 2.8
17-40 4.0
Sigma 85 1.4

Have barely had to get out with it all yet either. But, engagements and weddings coming soon!

f/4, f/4 IS, f/2.8, f/2.8 IS, f/2.8 IS MKII...? Which one? All are worth every penny.

Jason C

lisandra · « **Reply #20 on:** February 07, 2012, 06:47:38 PM »

Quote from: Jason C on February 07, 2012, 05:53:41 PM

Quote from: pretzston on February 06, 2012, 06:07:13 AM
I'm literally about the buy the 70-200 I think. Literally, I think. Ha.

I have:

35 1.4
50 1.4
45 T/S 2.8
17-40 4.0
Sigma 85 1.4

Have barely had to get out with it all yet either. But, engagements and weddings coming soon!
f/4, f/4 IS, f/2.8, f/2.8 IS, f/2.8 IS MKII...? Which one? All are worth every penny.

Jason C

O, this is sort of a continuation of previous thread, were talking 70-200 2.8 II. i find it noticeably more resolved than the first version

voyager · « **Reply #21 on:** February 07, 2012, 11:07:48 PM »

Quote from: pretzston on February 07, 2012, 05:28:38 PM

Canons. Ha.

Maybe I should delete it then.

Author Topic: PLEASE DELETE ME (Read 771 times)

Recent Topics

Recent Gallery